
Rules and ethics
Part of What the 2024 UK consumer law changes mean for beauty influencers
Beauty influencers: written disclosure policy or ad hoc?
Why beauty influencers need a written disclosure policy: UK rules, six drafting steps, campaign records and practical enforcement for creator partnerships.
Beauty influencers: written disclosure policy or ad hoc?
Start with brand control, then ask whether the creator received payment or another incentive. If both apply, require a clear disclosure and use the repeatable workflow below. If either test is unclear, check the arrangement and the content before deciding. The later branches cover publication checks, missing labels and changes.
If brand input shapes the post
If the brand directs, approves or otherwise controls the content, treat that as the first test, not the conclusion. Next ask whether the creator receives payment or another incentive. The UK rules overview and risk scenarios help staff recognise how unclear promotional content can mislead shoppers.
The consumer protection regime applies across the UK. The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 sets out the unfair commercial practices regime, replacing the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, and the CMA enforces it. The ASA also applies the CAP Code, whose Section 2 requires marketing communications to be obviously identifiable.
The CMA's guidance on unfair commercial practices is a starting point for consumer-facing brands in England. The rules apply across the UK, although enforcement priorities can differ; individual cases depend on their facts, so obtain qualified advice where necessary. Rule of thumb: test control first, then check for an incentive.
If a benefit changes hands
When money, goods, access or another benefit is part of the relationship, record it and continue to the control test. Cash, free products, event access, affiliate commission and ambassador arrangements can all be incentives. A written workflow can make expectations clear, including for ambassador deals.
Disclosure: needed or not
Needs disclosure
- Brand control
- Controls or approves
- Incentive
- Cash, gift, code
- Examples
- Paid posts, gifts, affiliate
No disclosure
- Brand control
- No involvement
- Incentive
- Bought it themselves
- Examples
- Pure editorial, organic post
A gifted product can count as payment when the brand sends it in exchange for coverage or with that expectation; cash does not have to change hands. The same principle applies to a free lipstick and a paid fee. Samples, fees or codes can all make an arrangement paid.
Do not let a creator's usual posting style substitute for a clear instruction about labelling. Beauty partnership models can involve different kinds of benefits, so record what the creator receives even when it is a product rather than cash. Rule of thumb: record the incentive, even when it is a product.
If the creator acts independently
If coverage is purely editorial without brand involvement, or a creator buys a product and posts without an arrangement, use this branch. Those are the stated exclusions. Where the facts fit neither description, do not assume a label is unnecessary; assess brand control and any incentive first.
A brand tag by itself does not settle whether a commercial arrangement exists. Check what the brand directed and what the creator received. If staff build a creator-contact list for outreach, check its data protection implications, including the lawful basis for using the information. Rule of thumb: no arrangement is different from an unlabelled deal.
If both tests point to disclosure
If the brand controls or approves the content and the creator receives an incentive, replace one-off requests with written instructions that staff and creators can repeat. List each collaboration type first. A planning template can capture paid posts, gifts, affiliate links and ambassador retainers.
- State the required words plainly, such as #ad or paid partnership with the brand named.
- Say where the label goesin the caption before the fold and in the platform disclosure tool.
- For videos and Stories, require a spoken or on-screen disclosure at the start.
- Name the person who checks each post before publication and a backup for when they are away.
- Put a version number on each brief and set a yearly review date.
- File the approved caption with a screenshot, plus a signed campaign record of the relationship, agreed label and approval date.
Drafting the policy in six steps
- List every collaboration type you run
- Write the required label in plain words
- State where the label must appear
- Require spoken or on-screen video disclosure
- Name who checks each post before it goes live
- Record a version number and file the caption
Make the instruction repeatable rather than leaving creators to interpret each request: specify who discloses, which words to use, where the label belongs and who checks it. Version each brief and retain the approved caption with its screenshot. Rule of thumb: one campaign, one approved instruction.
If the post is nearly ready
Before publication, require the label in the caption before the fold and use the platform's disclosure tool as well. Name the checker and a backup in advance. The brief can specify Instagram's Paid partnership label or TikTok's content disclosure setting as the relevant platform examples.
For video and Stories, require the disclosure at the start, spoken or displayed on screen. A caption instruction alone does not cover a live stream, so give creators format-specific directions. Train the marketing team to check the post and request a missing label calmly.
Check each format before it goes live, rather than assuming a caption instruction covers every placement. Assign responsibility in advance so a checker knows what to look for and whom to contact if the label is absent. Keep the check consistent across creators and campaigns. Rule of thumb: check the format before the post goes live.
If a label is absent or queried
If a post appears without its required label or a complaint arrives, keep the campaign record together. Save the contract, brief, approved wording and published link. A quality checklist can support a consistent record of what the brand requested.
The CMA's Instagram hidden-advertising action secured commitments from Instagram to tackle hidden advertising. Specify the label in the brief and preserve evidence of what the brand required for each post in the campaign file.
Set consequences in advance through service standards: request a correction, withhold final payment for an unlabelled post, or remove a creator from the roster after repeat breaches. Both brand and creator can face criticism; a written policy and pre-publication check show reasonable steps. Apply the same proportionate remedies at every tier. Rule of thumb: correct the post and retain the evidence.
If the deal, format or platform changes
Brief creators in writing before the first post and repeat the instruction at each renewal. When a format changes, provide fresh directions because a caption rule does not translate neatly to a live stream.
Make sure the person managing the community knows how to request a missing label without escalating publicly.
Review the policy at least yearly and whenever a platform changes its disclosure tools or a new partnership type is added. Record the review date and version, so staff can identify the current instruction and apply it when the roster or working method changes. Rule of thumb: reopen the instruction when the platform, format or deal changes.



